College SAT Requirements How to Find What SAT Score You Need

School SAT Requirements How to Find What SAT Score You Need SAT/ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Perhaps you definitely know your top school decision. Presently you need to realize what SAT score you have to get into your fantasy school. Tragically, there’s no basic answer. By and large, there is no SAT score prerequisite that promises you affirmation, particularly for the most specific universities. On the other hand, there normally isn’t a SAT score that will naturally exclude you from confirmation since schools utilize all encompassing affirmations. Your application will be assessed on your GPA, extracurricular exercises, suggestions, individual exposition, and SAT score. Be that as it may, your SAT score will fundamentally improve or diminish your probability of confirmation, and you can utilize accessible measurements to decide the SAT score you have to improve your odds of having the option to go to a specific school. Schools by and large state that they don't have SAT prerequisites, however in the event that you get a 800 and need to go to Harvard, measurably, you have almost a 0% possibility of picking up confirmation. In this article, I will examine SAT score prerequisites and how your SAT score impacts the school affirmations process. Will Your SAT Score Guarantee Your College Admission? Alone, your SAT score can't ensure your school acknowledgment. At the most specific schools, even understudies with flawless SAT scores are routinely dismissed. Recollect that your SAT score is just a single segment of your application, yet a significant one. An article from a 2013 release of Stanford Magazine expressed that 69% of Stanford candidates from the past 5 years with immaculate 2400 SAT scores (on the old test) were denied affirmation. What's more, from that point forward, the general acknowledgment rate to Stanford has dropped even lower. While your SAT score alone can't ensure your admission to a particular school, there are universities where your SAT score joined with your GPA can ensure affirmation. For California understudies, at the University of California, if your evaluations and state administered test scores joined are in the top 9% of California secondary school graduates and you're not acknowledged to any of the UC grounds you apply to, you'll be offered a spot at another grounds if space is accessible. Also, different states have ensured affirmation at a few or the entirety of their state funded colleges in the event that you get a specific GPA and SAT score. A portion of the states that offer ensured confirmation incorporate Iowa, Nevada, Texas, and Missouri. You should check the affirmations prerequisites on a school's site to check whether there is a comparable program and to discover the GPA and SAT score necessities for programmed confirmation. What Score Do You Need to Increase Your Chances of Admission? The SAT score required to improve your chances of picking up admission to a school differs relying upon the school. By and large, you should focus on in any event the 75th percentile SAT score of that school for your score to emphatically impact your application. Most schools distribute their 25th and 75th percentile scores. The rationale behind this system is that if your SAT score is well over the score of most of understudies at the school, at that point your SAT score will without a doubt help you when your application is assessed. Recall that on the off chance that you score over the 75th percentile for a school, at that point you've scored higher than in any event 75% of the understudies who go there. Your scores will contrast well with those of current understudies and that will altogether improve your odds of getting in. In any event, during the years when Stanford dismissed 69% of candidates with flawless SAT scores, the 31% acknowledgment rate for understudies with immaculate SAT scores was a whole lot higher than the general acknowledgment rate. During that time, the acknowledgment rate was 6%-8%. Understudies who got immaculate SAT scores gave themselves a drastically preferable possibility of being acknowledged over in the event that they had gotten a normal score for a Stanford candidate. On the off chance that your SAT score is nearer to the 25th percentile, at that point another segment of your application ought to be remarkable to have a practical taken shots at confirmation. On the off chance that your score is essentially lower than the 25th percentile, your chances of getting in are extremely thin. The most effective method to Find a School's 25th/75th Percentile SAT Scores To discover a school's 25th and 75th percentile SAT scores, you can utilize the PrepScholar database. We've accomplished the work for you. On your preferred web crawler, you can connect (school name) SAT necessities prepscholar and you'll find the solutions you're searching for. For instance, in case you're looking for UCLA, simply Google UCLA SAT necessities prepscholar. Here is all the data for Stanford University. For another model, here is all the data for the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Additionally, you should discover a school's strategy with respect to score decision and superscoring. PrepScholar school profiles give that data to you also. Step by step instructions to Determine Your SAT Target Score While planning for your SAT, you ought to have an objective score as a top priority. Your objective score can impact your examining, test-taking systems, and propel you to continue improving your SAT abilities. Here's the way to decide your SAT target score. Make a rundown of the schools you're keen on applying to. The normal of their 75th percentile SAT scores will be your objective score. To decide your area target scores, isolate your SAT target score by 2. In case you're applying to a building or science program, your math score can be marginally higher. Essentially, in case you're applying to a humanities program, your perusing and composing score can be somewhat higher. For progressively explicit data about SAT target scores, look at the post on what's a decent SAT score. Will Getting a Low SAT Score Prevent You From Going to College? Getting a low SAT score may keep you from getting into the school you had always wanted, yet it shouldn't prevent you from setting off for college. There are various schools that don't require SAT scores by any means. Likewise, most junior colleges don't require SAT scores. You generally have the alternative of heading off to a 2-year school and moving to a 4-year college. Remember that on the off chance that you do ineffectively on your SAT, high evaluations in school prep classes can make up for low grades. How well you do in four years of secondary school is more imperative to universities than how well you do on one government sanctioned test. In any case, on the off chance that you need to contend in NCAA sports, there are least SAT and ACT scores you should be qualified to contend. It's as yet conceivable to get into school on the off chance that you have low SAT scores. There may not be exacting SAT prerequisites for explicit schools or school all in all, yet excelling on your SAT should give you more school alternatives and improve your probability that you'll be admitted to the universities you need to join in. What's Next? For those of you despite everything wanting to arrive at your SAT target score, read these articles on the most proficient method to improve your SAT score and how to get an ideal SAT score. Additionally, figure out how to assemble the most flexible school application. Baffled with your scores? Need to improve your SAT score by 160 points?We've composed a guide about the best 5 techniques you should use to have a taken shots at improving your score. Download it with the expectation of complimentary at this point: Have companions who likewise need assistance with test prep? Offer this article! Tweet Justin Berkman About the Author Justin has broad experience showing SAT prep and directing secondary school understudies through the school confirmations and choice procedure. He is immovably dedicated to improving value in training and helping understudies to arrive at their instructive objectives. Justin got an athletic grant for aerobatic at Stanford University and graduated with a BA in American Studies. Get Free Guides to Boost Your SAT/ACT Get FREE EXCLUSIVE insider tips on the most proficient method to ACE THE SAT/ACT. 100% Privacy. No spam ever. hbspt.forms.create({ portalId: '360031', formId: '2167ba30-e68e-4777-b88d-8bf3c84579af', formInstanceId: '2', submitButtonClass: 'btn-red-light btn', target: '#hubspot-container2', redirectUrl: 'http://ww2.prepscholar.com/blog-buy in bless your heart', css: '.post-base .hs-form.stacked mark {display:none;} .post-base .hs-form.stacked .field div.input {padding-top: 55px; cushioning left: 300px;} .post-base .hs-input {width: 220px} .post-base .btn-essential, .hs-button.primary {margin-top:0px; cushioning left:350px} .post-base .hs-structure field {margin-bottom:5px}' }); $(function(){ $(.exclusive-tip-structure #hubspot-container2 label).hide(); }); work replace_tag(a, b){ $(a).each(function(index) { var thisTD = this; var newElement = $(); $.each(this.attributes, function(index) { $(newElement).attr(thisTD.attributes[index].name, thisTD.attributes[index].value); }); $(this).after(newElement).remove(); }); } $(function(){ replace_tag($(.posts-by-point h3), h2); }) Pose an Inquiry BelowHave any inquiries concerning this article or different subjects? Ask underneath and we'll answer!

Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essays

Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essays Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essay Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essay The Hebrew s left little writing to demo their imposts. Truth be told the solitary writing that is left from Hebrew society is otherworldly content. The core artistic plants being the Torah or Pentateuch, which is the initial five books of the Bible. These plants were non arranged all together of books until after the fall of the Hebrew state. From these writings we gain proficiency with a few things about how they lived. They were an extremely thorough society. They were non human-centric, yet accepted that God was the solitary of import being. This human advancement had a monotheistic conviction. The God that they revered was a just God and they did non request Him. God had full command over what took topographic point in their development. In the event that they addressed God they accepted that they would be rebuffed. In spite of the fact that Hebraic development is extremely unique in relation to present day twenty-four hours human advancement, there are three of import inside in formations that are as yet significant today. First Hebrew development was a Patriarchal society. Following, dress was of import to the situation of grown-up male. Last, justness was of import to their way of life. All through this exposition I am making a trip to elucidate how these things were winning to their general public and how they are as yet a part of our own today. One way that advanced human progress is like the Hebrew s is that it was a Patriarchal society. In the story of Noah in the book of Genesis no names of the grown-up females are referenced. Despite the fact that our general public has come a long way in this nation. We are as yet a grown-up male first society. In a marriage the grown-up females generally take the grown-up male s last name. A customary pre-marriage ceremony ordinarily finishes with the expression I currently present to you Mr. furthermore, Mrs. embed grown-up male s name here. In most two-parent puts the grown-up male is the caput of the family. T his is valid in my family unit in any event. Work powers are ordinarily the 1s that hold the vast majority of the significant level occupations in America. Most political spots are help by work powers each piece great. They ordinarily make a higher salary than grown-up females in a similar spot as them. In the story of innovative movement the Hebrew s saw Eve in a low-level place and accept that she was the ground for the pre-winter of grown-up male. This sets the stage for how starting now and into the foreseeable future grown-up females are nt referenced so a lot and are in lower puts in the Torah. In spite of the fact that our general public is nt near each piece male centric as the Hebrew s were, we despite everything have plentifulness of sexual orientation imbalance. Another characteristic of Hebrew progress that is as yet seeable today is the means by which clothes were of import and demonstrated the situation of grown-up male. This is obvious in the story of Joseph, which is other than in the book of Genesis. The coat that Joseph is given meant riches. The Jews cherished holding a cluster of shading in their array. The length of a coat other than was of import in the family unit. As Joseph rose in influence his attire exemplified more riches. As he fell in force or position he was deprived of his clothes or had clothes as pieces of clothing. In our general public today clothes much of the time do demo position. People groups need to buy the top exchange names so they can lift to a higher position or if nothing else seem like they are of a higher classification. People groups in high places are relied upon to have on more pleasant vesture than those in the lower classifications. People groups imagine this happens simply in secondary school with fledglings yet this is regular in adults each piece great. The expensive shops that well off, shrill individuals store at, ensure that it is non simple for low classification individuals to shop where they shop. Apparel, as in the Hebrew human advancement shows position of the social orders individuals. Third, justness was a property that was of import to the Hebrew s. It is something that is other than of import in our general public in spite of the way that we see it extremely in any case than the Hebrew s did in their clasp. Their situation of justness is shown in how God rebuffs His kin. It is appeared in a large number of the artistic plants that we have contemplated. The account of Creation shows their situation of justness. Adam was condemned to an existence of troublesome work alongside each other homo that was to come. Eve would suffer from birth strivings and the snake would eat soil. God had justness how he saw fit of rage. That would be the means by which the Hebrew s saw this situation. Equity is other than appeared in the story of Noah and the Tower of Babel. Today we take a gander at justness a little spot extraordinary. Our contemplations of justness appear to come to a grea t extent from the court. We consider liable until demonstrated unpracticed individual or an oculus for an oculus. We most likely inquiry things not at all like the Hebrew s. Actually justness is a perplexing thing in our social orders eyes. We without a doubt do nt hold an ideal justness framework, however it is something that we see actually amazingly, much like the Hebrew s. In choice, the Hebrew development has given a couple of things to our advanced twenty-four hours society. We contrast in numerous nations yet through clasp and a wide range of civilisations the entirety of the developments have shaped our general public into what it is today. The writing that has been abandoned from all civic establishments has given us a look into how our way of life has formed into what it is today. The Hebrew customs went along to us the attribute of a man centric culture. Despite the fact that along these lines, life previously and incompletely now has been all the more hard for grown-up f emales. Hebrew s other than identified with us in the way that vesture is of import to demoing the situation of grown-up male. Last, they esteemed justness. Despite the fact that they esteemed it extremely in any case than our general public, it was as yet of import to them, much like it is to our general public. Customs are passed down from coevalss to coevalss as they are passed down things modification. We perceive that through the writing that we read from the past civic establishments. As clasp passes by and more writing is composed we will at last be the past civic establishments. What we are go forthing behind today could help decide future social orders into incredible 1s!

How to Analyze Your Competitive Landscape Using Game Theory

How to Analyze Your Competitive Landscape Using Game Theory Success in business is hinged on many factors that owners and managers must focus on. One of these factors is the competition or, in a broader sense, the competitive climate that the business is operating in. This calls for looking and understanding the competitive landscape of the company. © Shutterstock.com | ImageFlowIn this article, you will first 1) get a short overview ot techniques to investigate the competitive landscape, and learn then about 2) using game theory to analyze your competitive landscape.THE COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPECompetitive landscape is simply defined as the analysis of how a business compares to other similar or competiting businesses. This analysis is often seen as all-encompassing, as it takes a look at a company’s products, services, strengths, weaknesses, growth models, and even sales and market share levels. This also involves the identification of the company’s rivals in the industry or the niche it belongs to, understanding what makes them tick, and figuring out how to hold their own and, eventually, do better than the competition.Why is there a need for businesses to know what their competitors are doing? Why should they care? Never forget that markets are essentially systems, where one action in one area may evoke responses from other areas. If a business hopes to have a solid footing in the market, it has to be aware of the possible responses of the competition. By knowing your competition, you are in a better position to understand why they responded in one way, instead of another way.In order to analyze a company’s competitiveness in the face of its rivals and competitors, there are several techniques employed by the so-called competitive intelligence analysts. Here are some of the most commonly used techniques:ADL MatrixIn this matrix, analysts look into a company’s level of industry maturity in relation to its competitive position, and how their relationship figures in the overall competitive strategy employed by the company. It tackles four stages in the industry life cycle: Embryonic, Growing, Mature, and Aging; while it named four competitive positions, namely: Weak, Tenable, Favorable, Strong and Dominant.Porter’s Five ForcesIn this framework developed by Michael Porter of Harvard Business School, the level of competitiveness of a company depends on the balance of power, or the 5 competitive forces that influences an industry: Rivalry or competition, Threat of New Entrants, Threat of Substitutes, Supplier Power and Buyer or Customer Power. In order for a company to have an advantage over its rivals in the industry, these forces have to be analyzed and used to determine the strengths and weaknesses of an industry.The Space MatrixThis analysis method focuses mainly on the competitive position of a company, taking into consideration its competitive advantage, financial strength, environmental stability and industry strength. The results of the analysis of these dimensions will enable the company to determine whether its strategic strength is classified as aggressive, competitive, conservative, or defensive.War GamingAs the phrase implies, war gaming involves playing out various scenarios of probable business actions or moves by competitors, and the possible responses of the com pany to these tactics and strategic moves. It is a simulation method used by many businesses in anticipation of their competition’s actions. As a tool to analyze the competitive landscape, it is very useful in understanding barriers to entry, gathering competitive intelligence, validating competitors’ strategies, and optimizing operational parameters.These are only a few of the techniques used by analysts to gain an understanding of the competitive landscape. Aside from the abovementioned techniques, there is one other method commonly used by analysts and even some of the largest companies in the world today, such as Microsoft and Chevron: the Game Theory.USING GAME THEORY TO ANALYZE COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPEMany are likely to think that War Gaming and Game Theory are one and the same or, at least, very similar.In order to anticipate the future actions or strategic moves of competitors, Game Theory serves as the “systematic study of strategies for dealing with competitive situatio ns where the results of one party will depend largely on that of the other parties or players”. Simply put, it recognizes that the success of making a choice or a decision will depend largely on the choices or decisions made by others.The similarities seen by many between War Gaming and Game Theory is probably due to the fact that the latter traces its origins in military theory, based largely on several warfare strategies and tactics that were used during the cold war. Thanks to mathematics, it has evolved into something more structured; hence, the Game Theory that we know about today.There is one important note to be aware of when using Game Theory to analyze the competitive landscape of a business: it is relevant only when there are relatively few players, or competitors, within that landscape. The results of the analysis becomes slightly irrelevant when there are a lot of players involved, since the impact of an action by one player will not be significant for the others. This method also entails looking hard at pay-offs and, with multiple players in the fold, there’s a chance that analysts will end up looking at a multitude of possible outcomes, which will eventually cloud the results of the analysis.Through Game Theory, businesses can determine the probable strategies that will be employed by their competitors in order to maximize their business objectives. It is also a way for them to get into their competitors’ heads and understand how their own choices have influenced those strategies.Elements of the GameLet us first take a look at the concept of “game” in Game Theory. There are five components involved:A set of players, or the decision-makers;A set of available strategies, actions or moves that players can make at specific points in the game;A set of payoffs or outcomes that are determined by the sequences of strategies or moves made by the players;Sets of information or knowledge that players will base their decisions or choices on; andEqu ilibria, or a stable result, where players may have considered all the information and the actions and strategies of other players, but still did not change their earlier choice or decision.A game of chess has often been likened to the game played in business or economics. There are the players squaring off against each other over a chessboard, with moves that they can use, all of which have been defined by the rules of chess. It is possible that the more experienced player wins while the other loses, or the other way around. But another possibility is that the game ends up in a draw, with neither team having a decisive win. This whole concept is also applicable in business, where you have two firms or companies pitted against each other, selling the same products or services in the same industry, and targeting the same market or audience. They have their own sets of strategies in order to sell more, or reach more of the market. The possible outcomes include one company outdoing or “outselling” the other, or both companies making the same impact to the market, more like a “draw” in a game of chess.Knowing the elements of a game will help us better understand they key assumptions of Game Theory.The players are rational maximizers. The competitors are seen as individuals or entities that add up and look at the pros and cons of every action or decision, and make a choice based on the outcome, choosing that which maximizes the benefit in his favor. Essentially, the players are seen as egoists, tending to display rational behavior when it is their own interests at play.The general argument against this assumption is on the presumed rationality of the players. After all, in the real world, not all humans do behave rationally, even if it is for their own benefits.The players have full information about each other. The Game Theory assumes that the competitors or players already understand everything that you are doing, as well as everything that they can do.Al l the payoffs are known. The players are fully aware of what the possible outcomes are, and what payoffs are expected.In reality the full information and payoffs are not known with certainty.Type of Games and Modes of PlayIn Game Theory, there are two types of games: the simultaneous games and the sequential games. 1. Simultaneous GamesIn this type of game, the moves are made at the same time. In a business context, it could mean two or three competitors making choices simultaneously, even before knowing what choices or decisions the other players are making.An example would be two U.S. fast food chains â€" let us call them Company A and Company B â€" deciding whether to enter the Southeast Asian Market or not. Both are aware of the other contemplating on this entry, and they are also mulling over the decision at the same time.The two companies make their own analysis on the market entry, and come up with a decision without waiting to hear what the other company has decided on. For instance, Company A may have decided to enter the market without knowing that Company B decided not to set up shop in the region. 2. Sequential GamesAs the name implies, these are games where the strategies or moves are made in sequence. The classic example is a game of chess, where one player cannot make a move unless the other player is done with his turn. They will be making their move based on the action or move previously made by the competition. Logical reasoning often comes into play here, since the players strategize after the competition has made their choice.In the example used in the Simultaneous Games, let us assume that Company A already has entered the Southeast Asian market, and Company B is contemplating on whether to follow suit or not. Company B saw that Company A is doing well in the region, so now it is seriously considering opening its fast food chain in the region as well. This is sequential, since Company B is only making a decision after Company A has made it s move.More than timing, what really differentiates these games is the availability of information before they make their own moves. In the real world, businesses actually play both games, combining elements of simultaneous and sequential games when making decisions.There are two modes of play prevalent in Game Theory. a. Non-cooperative GamesThis approach assumes that each player aims to maximize its own profit, depending on how the other players will act. In these types of games, players have a ‘dominant strategy’, or that one strategy that provides a payoff higher than the others, regardless of the choice or decision made by the other players. When faced with several options or choices, Game Theory would hold that the company should pick that which is best, since it is its dominant strategy.We have to take into account the so-called “Nash Equilibrium”, formulated by inventor John Nash. This is that state where “no player has an incentive to deviate from his chosen strat egy, even after taking into consideration the choice or decision made by the competition or other players. In short, even if the other players revealed their playing hand or their actions, it will not affect your own behavior or make you change your earlier decision or strategy, for the simple reason that it will not benefit you to do so. It becomes an equilibrium if the other player does the same, and neither of you has an incentive to change his chosen strategy.In conjunction with the Nash Equilibrium, the Prisoners’ Dilemma concept was also tackled. It gave the classic example of two prisoners being held for questioning in separate cells, with each of them given two choices: betray the other by turning in evidence and get a lighter jail sentence for it, or choosing not to snitch and keep quiet. It is either Defect or betray the other prisoner, or cooperate with the other prisoner and say nothing.The highest payoff is clear: getting a shorter jail sentence. However, there is a c hance that the two prisoners may choose to defect and betray each other. This would result in longer jail sentences for both of them. If only one defects and the other cooperates, the latter will get the harsher punishment, while the former will get the higher payoff.Nash equilibrium takes place when the two players choose to defect, because none of them is able to improve his situation or get the maximum possible payoff.Non-cooperative games are often presented in two forms: the extensive form and the normal form.Extensive Form: Normally used to represent non-cooperative games, this representation makes use of trees, with nodes (or vertex) representing points where the players have to make choices. It is somewhat similar to a decision tree, with lines representing possible actions and the payoffs presented at the bottom.In this form, the game is structured, with perfect information provided and decision-making done in a sequential manner. It begins with one player choosing one of a series of choices, and another player making a choice after having seen the decision by the first player. It ends when each player has obtained their payoffs.Normal Form: Also used for non-cooperative games, the normal form makes use of a matrix or a square with the main elements of the game â€" the players, actions/strategies, and payoffs â€" fully mapped out, with all the strategies or actions clearly associated with a payoff for each player.This representation also works best in simultaneous games, or games where the players make decisions without knowledge of the choices of the other players.b. Cooperative GamesThese take on a cooperative behavior among players, where they collaborate and agree on their strategic decisions and choices. The choices are made jointly, instead of separately.While there is no major argument against the overall cooperative approach, the main question arises with respect to the sustainability of its rewards. There are possibilities where a player can defect from what was agreed upon â€" after all, there is an incentive to do so, as the benefits could be greater for the player if it chooses to unilaterally alter its decision or switch strategies.Framework of Game TheoryThe applicability of the Game Theory varies, depending on the circumstances or the situations being evaluated or analyzed. However, over the years, analysts have been able to simplify its application. Here is a framework that can be followed by analysts when using the Game Theory to evaluate the competitive landscape.Defining the problem.Identifying the critical factors affecting competition, such as differentiated products, timing of entry, costs of entry and exit, and other variable costs.Building a game model. This would largely depend on the number of players involved, and what approach will be taken. Will it be cooperative, or non-cooperative?Development of intuition through the model built.Formulation of a strategy, after taking into account all the possible scenarios and situations.At best, the Game Theory is designed to come up with optimal rather than maximum strategies. It may not be the best and most recommended competitive intelligence analysis tool â€" even now, there are some questions on its applicability â€" but it certainly helps in providing businesses a clearer picture of the competitive field.